Distributed generation has these advantages:
* It can reduce or avoid the necessity to build new transmission/distribution lines or upgrade existing ones
* It can be configured to meet peak power needs
* It can diversify the range of energy sources in use and increase the reliability of the grid network
* It can be configured to provide premium power, when coupled with uninterruptible power supply (UPS)
* It is well-suited to the use of some renewable energy technologies, because they can be located close to the user and can be installed in small increments to match the load requirement of the customer.
* It can be configured to meet peak power needs
* It can diversify the range of energy sources in use and increase the reliability of the grid network
* It can be configured to provide premium power, when coupled with uninterruptible power supply (UPS)
* It is well-suited to the use of some renewable energy technologies, because they can be located close to the user and can be installed in small increments to match the load requirement of the customer.
When comparing the costs of different energy sources, an "apples to
apples" comparison is not straightforward for the following reasons:
* Power stations are major increments of power, which does not easily
make for comparison with distributed energy, which is installed in
relatively small increments.
* The cost of finance is critical to renewable energy sources. Energy
sources that utilize fossil fuels have both upfront costs and ongoing
costs (i.e. the cost of purchasing oil, gas), which means that a
substantial part of their total costs are spread over time. In contrast,
Renewable energy typically incurs a high upfront cost, but sees
extremely low ongoing costs. This means that a low cost of finance
amortized over the life of the equipment/capital investment can vastly
enhance the economics of renewable energy.
* Dispatchability has value. If the energy supply is "dispatchable",
it means the energy supply is guaranteed or predictable. The more
predictable it is, the higher its value. Fossil fuel driven power plants
and nuclear power are dispatchable. Renewable energy sources alone are
generally not. Therefore to make an "apples to apples' to comparison,
the renewable energy sources must be configured with a means of "energy
storage" (i.e. batteries or hybrid systems (renewable energy and another
energy source)) to create a true comparison fit with load curve.
An energy source that produces at the time of high demand (over a 24
hour period) has greater value to both the Utility and the Customer.
Periods of peak load are the most expensive time because the Utility has
to have that capacity available, yet that same capacity will remain
idle during other parts of the day. Solar Energy is a good fit with
daily load peaks where summer air conditioning is required and does not
need to be "dispatchable" as it can pass surplus power back to the grid
during the day, while drawing on the grid at night. This approach
maximizes the value, while minimizing the cost of Solar Energy.
* The economics of many renewables are dependent upon location and
therefore can vary dramatically. Wind requires certain minimum speeds,
solar economics can be optimized in regions of the world with good
sunlight conditions. So a single cost per kilowatt hour can be
misleading and the answer should be presented in the form of cost
ranges.
Get your copy of Get your copy of "Home Made Energy" here
No comments:
Post a Comment